ISLAMABAD: The board of governors (BoG) of the International Islamic College Islamabad (IIUI) on Friday revealed its ‘fulfillment’ over the university administration’s handling of a claimed rape case in the college hostel.
The BoG, headed by IIUI Rector Dr Masoom Yasinzai, fulfilled on Friday to review the single factor schedule of sexual offense on a pupil in the hostel.
The incident took place on Friday last but after a gap of a week the college obtained an FIR signed up on Thursday.
The BoG, nevertheless, guided the IIUI management to take action against those ‘incorrectly propagating’ the event to sully the university.
” Today, our BoG in its meeting revealed contentment over the efforts of the IIUI administration for truly handling the instance. However, the BoG directed the university to do something about it versus those elements who are running a fake war the IIUI,” stated the college’s speaker, Nasir Farid.
Asked why the FIR of the incident was postponed for a week, he said: “Originally, the target was not forthcoming to register the FIR, so later we chose to obtain the case signed up on behalf of the university.”
BoG directs college admin to act against those ‘wrongly propagating’ incident
He said the FIR had been signed up and also one of the supposed rapists, an IIUI pupil, had been apprehended by the police.
The FIR was registered in feedback to a complaint lodged by IIUI safety and security supervisor Shaukat Mehmood Abbasi at the Sabzi Mandi police station under section 377 (unnatural offences) of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
According to the FIR, the 24-year-old was brought to the university by a student on June 18. Later on, the pupil called one more pupil as well as they raped him. It stated a security personnel of the college found the young people when he came out of the hostel room as well as asked him for identification.
The boy informed the guard that he had concerned the college himself and later on both students took him to the hostel and also raped him.
A policeman informed Dawn that the target had actually rejected to obtain his medical examination performed.
After enrollment of the instance, the authorities apprehended one of the students, while initiatives remain in progression to detain the other, the officer said.
The investigators are also trying to map the sufferer to obtain his statement, he added.The IIUI at first did not show any kind of severe interest in enrollment of the FIR, stating that the sufferer did not wish to get the FIR registered. Nevertheless, when the concern was highlighted on social media the university was compelled to obtain the case registered on Thursday.
Adhering to the incident, the IIUI eliminated both the students as well as put on hold the concerned security guards.
The rape occurrence happened in a room where one of the alleged rapists was unlawfully residing due to the influence of his sibling, who was serving as the resident house tutor (RHT) – an article suggested for senior faculty/administrator to lead trainees. Yet the IIUI designated a legal superintendent on the post.
A faculty member of the IIUI informed Dawn that the case need to be correctly checked out as just how the affirmed rapist was unlawfully staying in the area where he had actually welcomed the pupil of one more college. Why RHT as well as hostel warden permitted them entrance.
“Why gatekeeper did not pay attention to the incident?” The professor said the provost in the past had actually been eliminated on corruption fees while the chief gatekeeper had been sacked on alleged misbehavior. Later on, nonetheless, both were given their settings back. He claimed years after his elimination, the chief gatekeeper was rehired a few months back without promoting the article.
But the university agent claimed after the incident the RHT had actually been gotten rid of from the message.
Regarding the hostel warden as well as the chief security officer, he claimed the warden was gotten rid of yet charges against him could not be proven, for that reason, he was recovered.
Likewise, he stated, the gatekeeper several years earlier was sent packing as his agreement was not extended, but “we rehired him in 2015 because of his experience and also best discussion,” he stated.
In reaction to an inquiry regarding skipping the competitive process for working with the primary gatekeeper, the speaker claimed the security officer was rehired because of his finest discussion.
“We called three persons for giving presentation as well as he was chosen,” the agent said, including some elements after the rape instance were raising old and also unproved concerns just to disparage the university management.