A petitioner has tested a Lahore High Court (LHC) order to acquit a Christian pair languishing behind bars for several years over blasphemy charges and also contended that the LHC drew an incorrect conclusion which led to a “gross losing the unborn baby” of justice.
A trial court in Toba Tek Singh on April 4, 2014 sentence Shafqat Masih as well as his better half Shagufta Kausar to fatality under Area 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) read with Section 34 for sending out blasphemous messages through their cellphones.
However, an LHC division bench– making up Justice Shahbaz Ali Rizvi and Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh– on June 3 acquitted the couple after the prosecution “stopped working to establish the situation beyond doubt”.
Elderly advocate Ghulam Mustafa Chaudhary has actually currently challenged the LHC order by filing an appeal in the High court Lahore Pc Registry. According to the charm, the LHC’s bench “stopped working to value the realities as well as legislation of the case in their real perspective and also drew an incorrect final thought”.
” The observation of the LHC’s department bench to the impact that ‘the appellants can be convicted only if the prosecution establishes that the handset (phone) came from them or remained in their use and also they authored as well as sent the message is an unlikely creativity going a lot listed below the ground truths.”
Read Also :PM Imran inspects Pakistani-made electronic voting machine
It said the department bench did not discuss, talk about or distinguish the criterion laws created throughout debates from the complainant side, adding that the proof of judicial confession was important and the best proof in the eye of law.
” [This is so] because Muhammad Nasir Siyal, superintendent of cops (PW-11) before whom firstly the accused had actually confessed his regret, had actually taken him to the magistrate promptly, where once again admission was taped … and it was not shown from any document that the stated confession was not willingly.”
The charm claimed while determining the criminal allure versus sentence of the culprits after a full-fledged trial, there was no occasion or validation for the division bench to launch “academic as well as academic discussion” with reference to Articles 4, 9,10, and also 10-A of the Constitution.
” The vital thing is that all regulations are made and applied for public good as well as innovation of justice, therefore, punishment of the bad guys is of equivalent relevance.”
” In a situation where the realities, scenarios and also proof on record confirm sense of guilt of the charged beyond any kind of shadow of uncertainty, penalty of the offenders becomes rather unpreventable for the easy factor that to allow the criminal companion complimentary, suggests to punish the whole culture,” it added.
Plaintiff Muhamad Hussain on July 18, 2013 was offering prayer in a mosque when he received a message on his phone. When he examined the phone he located that it was a sacrilegious message from an unidentified mobile number.
The complainant showed these messages to one Khalid Maqsood as well as Muhammad Shabbir as well as others. The complainant acquired prints of these cursing SMS as well as went to the office of Sajjad Asghar Khokhar for starting lawful procedures against the suspects.
He was still there when he received five even more SMS from the aforementioned number with the very same derogatory contents. He revealed them to Sajjad Ashgar that called the sender from his phone to know that the person was yet no one grabbed the phone. Afterwards, the police signed up a situation as well as jailed the accused for claimed blasphemy.
Discussion about this post